Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162299›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2026

Global vaccine development.

Jerome H Kim, Nicaise Ndembi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jerome H KimInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jerome.kim@ivi.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-6438
Nicaise NdembiInternational Vaccine Institute, Africa Regional Office, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the inception of the World Health Organization (WHO) Extended Programme on Immunization in 1974, vaccines have saved the lives of approximately 150 million children, and they continue to save 2-5 million lives each year, according to WHO estimates. The consensus around the benefit and funding of childhood vaccination in low- and middle-income countries has unraveled, and the hard-won gains of the past quarter century are at risk. At the same time, in some high-income countries, vaccine hesitancy-sometimes enabled by government policy pronouncements-has led to reductions in vaccination, resulting in outbreaks of measles in countries that had eliminated this disease. Despite these setbacks, advances in vaccine platform technologies, new immunogens, and new and expanding target populations have the potential to extend the direct and indirect effects of vaccination across the life course. In this Perspective, we discuss how each of these advances could shape the future vaccine landscape. We also highlight cross-cutting issues, including those related to equity, manufacturing, funding and vaccine hesitancy, which make successful implementation more complex.

Indexed as

Vaccine DevelopmentVaccinesGlobal HealthHumansImmunization ProgramsMeaslesVaccinationVaccination HesitancyWorld Health OrganizationVaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.