ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026
Carprofen and buprenorphine delivery using micropipette-guided drug administration (MDA) in mice.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Refined, non-invasive analgesic delivery methods are essential for improving animal welfare and ethical standards in laboratory rodent research. Here, we evaluated whether the micropipette-guided drug administration (MDA) method, which promotes voluntary consumption using a sweetened condensed milk vehicle, achieves therapeutically relevant plasma and brain concentrations of two widely used analgesics, carprofen and buprenorphine, in male and female C57BL/6 N and BALB/c mice. Carprofen administered via MDA at 5, 15, and 30 mg/kg produced dose-response relationships and plasma exposure comparable to those observed following conventional subcutaneous (SC) injection of the same doses, with plasma concentrations exceeding the recommended therapeutic threshold ( ~ 25 μg/mL) in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the administration route substantially influenced plasma and brain concentrations of buprenorphine, which was administered at higher doses for MDA (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg) than for SC injection (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mg/kg) to compensate for presystemic first-pass metabolism. Specifically, SC injections of buprenorphine produced higher plasma concentrations early after administration, whereas MDA caused a dose-dependent delay in peak plasma levels and led to higher plasma concentrations of the major metabolite, buprenorphine-3-glucuronide. Although plasma concentrations of buprenorphine did not reach the recommended therapeutic threshold (1 ng/mL) for either administration route, brain concentrations exceeded proposed efficacy thresholds (3-5 ng/g) at 8 h post-treatment across all MDA buprenorphine doses. Together, our findings demonstrate that MDA provides an effective alternative to parenteral injection for analgesic treatment, while underscoring the importance of evaluating central drug exposure in addition to plasma concentrations.
Identifiers
42162265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.