ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Cannula Gauge and Tissue Penetration Forces in the Temporal Region: A Biomechanical Basis for Injection Safety.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBlunt-tip cannulas are widely used for facial filler injections, yet quantitative data on tissue penetration force (TPF) across temporal planes remain limited. We quantified the effects of cannula gauge, tissue plane, and advancement direction on TPF in the temporal region to provide a biomechanical basis for injection safety.
methodsIn 21 fresh Korean cadavers, we performed 3,664 insertions with 21G-27G cannulas at two sites-temporal crest (TC) and zygomatic arch (ZA)-advancing vertically and horizontally at a controlled, uniform speed. Forces were recorded continuously with a handheld digital force gauge. Anatomical layers were identified (skin, superficial temporal fascia [STF], deep temporal fascia [DTF]), and measurements were mapped to two procedural planes: L2 (subdermal; superficial to STF) and L4 (inter-fascial; between STF and DTF). Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models to account for repeated measurements within cadavers, and p values from pairwise comparisons were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) procedure (α = 0.05).
resultsTPF increased with larger cannula diameter and with depth-i.e., skin ≤ STF < DTF (FDR-adjusted p < 0.05)-and was higher in horizontal than vertical advancement (mixed-effects model p = 0.0068). A cannula diameter of 21G produced the greatest resistance, whereas that of 27G produced the lowest. Increasing age was associated with lower TPF (p < 0.05). No sex or side of the body differences was detected.
conclusionsTemporal TPF shows systematic dependencies on gauge, plane, and direction, delineating mechanical conditions that may precede vascular penetration events. Although vascular penetration force (VPF) was not measured, the findings support a "TPF-first" strategy of pre-dissection/hydrodissection to create a low-resistance track, followed by low-pressure, retrograde micro-aliquots to limit instantaneous force peaks and preserve a favorable safety margin by maintaining TPF less than VPF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Quantitative TPF profiles can assist in selecting cannula gauge/plane and in structuring low-pressure, incremental, retrograde injections in the temporal region to mitigate vascular injury. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42162210What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.