ArticleCommunications chemistry2026
Phenotypic AI-based design of cell-specific small molecule cytotoxics.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is transforming drug discovery by enabling exploration of vast chemical spaces and the design of new molecules with tailored properties. However, most approaches focus on chemical features or protein binding, leaving phenotypic discovery underexplored. Here, we present a framework to design small molecules with selective toxicity in pancreatic cancer cells by combining large-scale screening data with AI models. Using data from over 11,000 compounds tested across cancer and control cell lines, we trained predictive models and integrated them into a generative system to design new candidates. This approach produced novel molecules with desired cell-specific effects, many of which were structurally distinct from known compounds. Experimental validation confirmed that several designed molecules showed the intended selective activity, outperforming conventional screening strategies. Overall, this work highlights the potential of combining predictive and generative AI to design compounds with complex biological effects without relying on predefined targets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.