ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026
Predicting sperm retrieval success in salvage testicular sperm extraction: a machine learning perspective.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seminal-Plasma Molecular Biomarkers as a Liquid Biopsy of Testicular Function: Toward AI-Ready Sperm-Retrieval Prediction in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This multicenter retrospective observational study aimed to identify predictive factors for successful secondary testicular sperm extraction (TESE) using advanced machine learning (ML) models. Data from 503 infertile men who underwent secondary TESE between 2021 and 2024 after a previous unsuccessful attempt were analyzed. Preoperative characteristics and laboratory findings were assessed using ten ML algorithms, including Xtreme Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree, AdaBoost, Logistic Regression, Multi-Layer Perceptron, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Naive Bayes. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, F1 score, Youden Index, and area under the ROC curve. Sperm retrieval succeeded in 211 patients (41.9%) and failed in 292 (58.1%). Mean infertility duration was 7.25 years. Xtreme Gradient Boosting consistently outperformed other algorithms across all performance metrics. Key predictors of successful secondary TESE included preoperative body mass index, TESE location, luteinizing hormone level, and semen volume. Testicular volumes and infertility duration also contributed significantly to prediction accuracy. Incorporating multiple clinical and laboratory parameters into ML-based predictive models can improve surgical planning and preoperative counseling. For men undergoing secondary TESE, these models may identify those with a very low chance of success, reducing unnecessary repeat surgical interventions.
Identifiers
42162187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.