Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162187›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026

Predicting sperm retrieval success in salvage testicular sperm extraction: a machine learning perspective.

Berk Hazir, Ali Sahin, Mehmet Hamza Gultekin, Cevahir Ozer, Mehmet Vehbi Kayra, Eray Hasirci, Erman Ceyhan, Mesut Altan, Tufan Cicek, Yalcin Kizilkan and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Berk HazirDepartment of Urology, Etlik City Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8907-8781
Ali SahinDepartment of Urology, Selcuk University School of Medicine, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3139-8205
Mehmet Hamza GultekinDepartment of Urology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Cevahir OzerDepartment of Urology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-6912
Mehmet Vehbi KayraDepartment of Urology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7349-9952
Eray HasirciDepartment of Urology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Erman CeyhanDepartment of Urology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8223-6399
Mesut AltanDepartment of Urology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-9954
Tufan CicekDepartment of Urology, Etlik City Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.
Yalcin KizilkanDepartment of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.
Mesut Berkan DuranDepartment of Urology, Pamukkale University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8597-2081
Muhammed Arif İbisDepartment of Urology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Gokhan CekerDepartment of Urology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7891-9450
Cem SahDepartment of Urology, Adana Medline Hospital, Adana, Türkiye.
Nebil AkdoganDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.
İyimser UreDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Türkiye.
Ali Can AlbazDepartment of Urology, Manisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7725-1241
Aykut BaserDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty, Bandırma Onyedi Eylul University, Balikesir, Türkiye.
Murat GülDepartment of Urology, Selcuk University School of Medicine, Konya, Türkiye. murat.gul@selcuk.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6657-6227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This multicenter retrospective observational study aimed to identify predictive factors for successful secondary testicular sperm extraction (TESE) using advanced machine learning (ML) models. Data from 503 infertile men who underwent secondary TESE between 2021 and 2024 after a previous unsuccessful attempt were analyzed. Preoperative characteristics and laboratory findings were assessed using ten ML algorithms, including Xtreme Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree, AdaBoost, Logistic Regression, Multi-Layer Perceptron, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Naive Bayes. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, F1 score, Youden Index, and area under the ROC curve. Sperm retrieval succeeded in 211 patients (41.9%) and failed in 292 (58.1%). Mean infertility duration was 7.25 years. Xtreme Gradient Boosting consistently outperformed other algorithms across all performance metrics. Key predictors of successful secondary TESE included preoperative body mass index, TESE location, luteinizing hormone level, and semen volume. Testicular volumes and infertility duration also contributed significantly to prediction accuracy. Incorporating multiple clinical and laboratory parameters into ML-based predictive models can improve surgical planning and preoperative counseling. For men undergoing secondary TESE, these models may identify those with a very low chance of success, reducing unnecessary repeat surgical interventions.

Identifiers

PMID42162187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.