Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162177›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Expressive activation enhances user satisfaction in AIGC co-creation through perceived control and meaning-making.

Ya-Qin You, Shing-Sheng Guan, Yu-Liang Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ya-Qin YouArtificial Intelligence Innovation Design Research Center, Jiangsu University of Technology, ChangZhou, JiangSu, China.
Shing-Sheng GuanFaculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Macau, China.
Yu-Liang FengArtificial Intelligence Innovation Design Research Center, Jiangsu University of Technology, ChangZhou, JiangSu, China. 329860809@qq.com.

Funding

2025 Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Research Planning Fund Project: Study on the Healing Mechanisms and Personalized Recommendation of AIGC Visual Arts from a Neuroaesthetic Perspective 25YJAZH041the Jiangsu Provincial Higher Education Humanities and Social Sciences Project 2023SJYB1260the Jiangsu University of Technology Social Science Foundation "Talent Introduction Project" KYY21515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As generative artificial intelligence (AIGC) tools gain widespread application in creative design, growing concerns have been raised over users' diminished sense of control and the emotional shallowness of AI-generated content. These limitations may undermine users' sense of engagement and overall satisfaction in co-creation tasks. This study investigates how expressive activation-defined as guiding users to recall and express personal emotions and memories during a simulated creative process-shapes perceived user experience in a questionnaire-based simulated AIGC co-creation scenario. Using a survey-based scenario task, data were collected from 129 participants who had general experience using AIGC tools (68 in the expressive activation group and 61 in the non-expressive activation group). The results showed that expressive activation significantly increased user satisfaction. Furthermore, perceived control and perceived meaning-making ability served as sequential mediators, forming a chained path: expressive activation → perceived control → meaning-making → satisfaction. These findings suggest that, within a questionnaire-based simulated co-creation scenario, encouraging expressive engagement can enhance participants' perceived psychological agency and emotional connection, thereby improving perceived satisfaction. This study identifies key psychological mechanisms relevant to human-AI co-creation and offers preliminary design insights for building AIGC systems that may foster deeper meaning and emotional resonance.

Indexed as

Generative Artificial IntelligencePersonal SatisfactionAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleSense of AgencySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAIGC co-creationExpressive activationHuman–AI interaction strategiesPerceived controlPerceived meaning-makingUser satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42162177
PMCPMC13342229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.