ArticleScientific reports2026
Expressive activation enhances user satisfaction in AIGC co-creation through perceived control and meaning-making.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As generative artificial intelligence (AIGC) tools gain widespread application in creative design, growing concerns have been raised over users' diminished sense of control and the emotional shallowness of AI-generated content. These limitations may undermine users' sense of engagement and overall satisfaction in co-creation tasks. This study investigates how expressive activation-defined as guiding users to recall and express personal emotions and memories during a simulated creative process-shapes perceived user experience in a questionnaire-based simulated AIGC co-creation scenario. Using a survey-based scenario task, data were collected from 129 participants who had general experience using AIGC tools (68 in the expressive activation group and 61 in the non-expressive activation group). The results showed that expressive activation significantly increased user satisfaction. Furthermore, perceived control and perceived meaning-making ability served as sequential mediators, forming a chained path: expressive activation → perceived control → meaning-making → satisfaction. These findings suggest that, within a questionnaire-based simulated co-creation scenario, encouraging expressive engagement can enhance participants' perceived psychological agency and emotional connection, thereby improving perceived satisfaction. This study identifies key psychological mechanisms relevant to human-AI co-creation and offers preliminary design insights for building AIGC systems that may foster deeper meaning and emotional resonance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.