ArticleScientific reports2026
Predictive risk model for bone metastasis in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A seven-variable clinical prediction model for bone metastasis at initial diagnosis of prostate cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop and validate a nomogram to identify patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer who do not require a bone scan. Data from 305 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer who were hospitalized at the Department of Urology of the First People's Hospital of Nantong between September 2023 and December 2025 and who underwent pretreatment bone imaging (99mTc-MDP scintigraphy) were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were randomly assigned to training and internal validation groups at a ratio of 7:3. After the optimal predictive features were selected via minimum absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, the predictive model was constructed using multiple logistic regression, and internal validation was performed with split-sample and bootstrap calibration. A total of 305 people with moderate-risk prostate cancer were included in this study. Of these, 54 (17.7%) had bone metastases, and 251 (82.3%) did not. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), fibrinogen (FIB), hemoglobin, and the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) were incorporated into the final model. We thoroughly evaluated the performance of the model according to clinical utility (decision curve analysis), calibration (calibration curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test), and discrimination (ROC analysis, AUC). In both the training (AUC 0.880, 95% CI 0.812-0.947) and validation (AUC 0.877, 95% CI 0.782-0.971) groups, the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were excellent. The PSA, SII, FIB, and hemoglobin levels are independent predictive factors for bone metastasis in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, and the constructed nomogram has good predictive value for identifying patients who do not need bone scans. A limitation of this study is its retrospective single-center design, which may lead to selection bias and limit the generalizability of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.