Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162155›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Consumer awareness, perceptions and purchasing behaviour regarding fortified wheat flour available in the market.

Dhananjay, Monika Choudhary, Prabhdeep Kaur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

DhananjayDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Monika ChoudharyDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. drmchoudhary@pau.edu.
Prabhdeep KaurDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study examined consumer awareness regarding fortified wheat flour available in the market. A total of 300 households were selected using stratified random sampling. Based on socio-economic status assessed through the Modified Kuppuswamy Scale, 180 respondents (60 each from Upper, Upper Middle, and Lower Middle classes) were selected for assessing awareness, preference, and consumption of fortified wheat flour. Data were collected using a pre-tested structured interview schedule. It was revealed that awareness level was the highest among the Upper Class across all aspects of food fortification, with particularly strong knowledge of macro & micronutrients (91.70%). Awareness decreased across socioeconomic groups, with the Lower Middle Class showing the least understanding, especially regarding the fortification logo (26.70%). The computed Chi-square value for overall awareness (10.97) was found to be non-significant. A majority of respondents perceived fortified wheat flour as costlier, while Lower Middle class respondents more frequently reported a taste difference between fortified and unfortified wheat flour. Fortified flours were perceived as safest for pregnant women (56.10%), lactating mothers (52.20%), and infants (45%). The Chi-square test for these categories yielded a value of 19.82, which was not statistically significant, indicating no significant difference in preference among socio-economic classes. Fewer subjects associated them with specific groups like athletes, aged, or diseased persons, with awareness the highest among the Upper Class. The study concluded that although fortified wheat flour was available in the market, gaps existed in consumer awareness, indicating the need for improved consumer education.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorFlourFood, FortifiedTriticumAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsFood fortificationFortified wheat flour awarenessSocio-economic status

Identifiers

PMID42162155
PMCPMC13391486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.