Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162151›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Quantifying regional contributions to sex classification from fundus photographs via a two-stage attention-based deep learning approach.

Joseph Kim, Shina Jang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joseph KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea. jkim0529@naver.com.
Shina JangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea.

Funding

Inha University Hospital Research Grant (2025-33-004)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study quantitatively assesses the relative contribution of anatomically defined retinal regions (macula, optic disc, and retinal vasculature) to biological sex classification from fundus photographs. We developed a two-stage multi-branch framework using pre-trained ResNet50 backbones for region-specific feature extraction and an attention-based fusion module that produces ROI-level scalar weights. The dataset comprised 3,478 eye-level fundus images with a balanced sex distribution, and data were split on a subject-wise basis to avoid information leakage between sets. The fusion model achieved the highest discriminative performance (AUC = 0.861; 95% CI: 0.826-0.895). Single-branch results suggested complementary tendencies, with the macula branch showing higher sensitivity for female classification and the optic disc branch showing higher specificity for male classification. In the fusion model, mean attention weights for the macula (0.408; 95% CI: 0.369-0.446) and optic disc (0.383; 95% CI: 0.347-0.418) were comparable (p = 0.506), and both were significantly higher than those for the vasculature (0.209; 95% CI: 0.184-0.238; p < 0.001). These region-level weights provide a reproducible, quantitative estimate of model reliance across predefined ROIs and complement qualitative explainability methods. Overall, the proposed framework supports more transparent and anatomically interpretable AI for fundus-based sex classification.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFundus OculiImage Processing, Computer-AssistedConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansMacula LuteaMaleOptic DiskPhotographyRetinal Vessels

Identifiers

PMID42162151
PMCPMC13507128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.