ArticleScientific reports2026
GNN enhanced reinforcement learning for robot navigation in complex topological networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the challenges encountered by intelligent robots in perceiving high-dimensional environmental states and making adaptive trajectory planning decisions in complex topological environments, this paper presents a Graph Neural Network-Reinforcement Learning (GNN-RL) integrated framework, implemented based on the Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) algorithm for continuous control tasks. First, leveraging the topological modeling capability of GNNs, environmental entities are abstracted into graph nodes, and their spatial constraints and semantic associations are encoded as edge features. Through multi-layer graph convolution and adaptive edge weighting, high-dimensional structured environmental information is compressed into low-dimensional node-level and graph-level embeddings with rich topological semantics. This provides structured environmental cognition for the subsequent reinforcement learning module, alleviating the curse of dimensionality and enabling efficient action selection. Second, a dynamic collaborative mechanism between the GNN encoder and the SAC-based RL agent is established. The topological features extracted by the GNN are fed as input to the RL agent, which consists of twin Q-networks, a policy network, and a value network. A multi-objective reward function, which integrates safety, progress, and motion smoothness, guides the agent's trial-and-error exploration. In this manner, static topological representations are transformed into dynamic trajectory policies, while the GNN parameters are jointly optimized end-to-end via the gradient signals from the RL loss function, overcoming the limitations of purely static graph learning. Finally, comprehensive comparative experiments are conducted in simulated complex topological environments, evaluating the proposed GNN-RL approach against DQN, PPO, and A* algorithms. The results show that the GNN-RL method achieves a favorable balance between perception accuracy and decision-making efficiency, providing a reliable and adaptive solution for robot navigation and trajectory planning in structured, dynamic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.