Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162126›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Decision-making, regret, and quality of life in living organ donors: a cross-sectional study.

Yenigül Kim, Hatice Öner Cengiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yenigül KimInstitute of Health Sciences, Ankara University, 06590, Ankara, Türkiye.
Hatice Öner CengizFaculty of Nursing, Department of Nursing, Department of Surgical Diseases Nursing, Ankara University, 06590, Ankara, Türkiye. hocengiz@ankara.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify factors influencing living donors' decision-making, regret, and quality of life. This cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational study was conducted between June and October 2023 and included 128 living liver or other organ donors who were at least three months post-surgery. Data were collected using a questionnaire, the Decision Regret Scale, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Short Form. The mean age of the participants was 49.48 ± 11.43, 75% of them decided to donate on their own, the mean score on the Decision Regret Scale was 22.5 ± 16.25, and the mean score for general quality of life perception was 63.59 ± 14.2. It was determined that there was a moderate negative correlation between the mean scores of the Decision Regret Scale and the mean scores of the physical, social, and psychological quality of life subdomains. The findings indicated that psychological quality of life and the length of the donation decision-making period were the primary determinants of regret levels (p < 0.05). The psychological well-being of living organ donors and the duration of the decision-making process can influence post-donation regret, which in turn has a direct impact on donors' quality of life.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmotionsLiving DonorsQuality of LifeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesKidney transplantationLiver transplantationLiving donorsOrgan donationQuality of lifeRegret

Identifiers

PMID42162126
PMCPMC13385749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.