Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162116›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Multicenter machine learning model for assessing the impact of malignancy on in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients: a clinical decision support system with interpretable artificial intelligence.

Tao Zhang, Zihan Nan, Shaohan Guo, Shiju Yang, Leying Li, Yifei Zhang, Yan Xin, Zhenjie Hu, Congcong Zhao

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tao Zhang *The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Zihan Nan *The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Shaohan GuoThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Shiju YangThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Leying LiThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Yifei ZhangHebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei, China.
Yan XinShijiazhuang Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Zhenjie HuThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China. 46400533@hebmu.edu.cn.
Congcong ZhaoThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China. syicuzcc@hebmu.edu.cn.

Funding

The Medical Science Research Project of Hebei 20250673The S&T Program of Hebei 223777104D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) and malignancy represent two major global health burdens that frequently coexist and lead to poor clinical outcomes. However, the specific impact of malignancy on in-hospital mortality in HF patients remains incompletely understood, and reliable predictive tools specifically for HF patients with comorbid malignancy are currently lacking. This multicenter retrospective study analyzed data from the eICU collaborative research database (eICU database), medical information mart for intensive care IV (MIMIC-IV) databases, and medical information mart for intensive care III (MIMIC-III) databases, including 21,403 HF patients (3341 with malignancy). We employed three analytical approaches: propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), and multivariable logistic regression to assess malignancy-associated mortality risk. For predictive modeling, five machine learning algorithms were trained on the eICU database (70% training, 30% internal validation) and externally validated using both MIMIC-IV and MIMIC-III datasets. All three analytical methods (PSM, IPTW, and multivariable regression) yielded highly consistent results, demonstrating that malignancy significantly increased in-hospital mortality risk (PSM: OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.24; IPTW: OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.31; multivariable regression: OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08-1.36). The AdaBoost model, developed using 19 key predictive variables selected by the Boruta algorithm, demonstrated excellent performance with a training set AUC of 0.849 and internal validation AUC of 0.740, while maintaining good discriminative ability in external validation (MIMIC-IV: AUC 0.739; MIMIC-III: AUC 0.699). To enhance model interpretability, SHapley additive exPlanations analysis revealed the top five predictive variables: simplified acute physiology score II, mechanical ventilation requirement, heart rate, body temperature, and respiratory rate. For clinical implementation, we developed a web-based calculator (available at:  https://nanzihan1998.shinyapps.io/Mortality/ ) to facilitate real-time mortality risk assessment. Our analysis suggests malignancy is associated with worse outcomes in HF patients. We developed an interpretable machine learning model that demonstrated moderate predictive performance for in-hospital mortality in this high-risk population. This approach could serve as a foundation for future risk stratification tools, but requires prospective validation before clinical application.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalHeart FailureHospital MortalityMachine LearningNeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesHeart failureIn-hospital mortalityInterpretable AIMachine learningMalignancyPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID42162116
PMCPMC13396362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.