Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162114›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A temporal keyword co-occurrence network mining framework for detecting structural transitions in cancer biomarker research (2006-2023).

Jeena Hwang, Soyoung Kim, Hyewon Kim, Juhwan Seo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeena HwangKorea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), 66 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02456, Republic of Korea. jeena@kisti.re.kr.
Soyoung KimKorea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), 66 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02456, Republic of Korea.
Hyewon KimKorea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), 66 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02456, Republic of Korea.
Juhwan SeoKorea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), 66 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02456, Republic of Korea.

Funding

This research was supported by Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI). K25L4M2C4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarker research for cancer diagnosis and prognosis has rapidly expanded technologically and thematically, along with advancements in molecular diagnostics, liquid biopsy, immunotherapy, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies. However, few studies have systematically structured these technological transitions and research framework changes using time-series analyses. Accordingly, this study treated cancer biomarker research as a large-scale biological knowledge system and aimed to examine the structural transitions and patterns of technological evolution through a temporal network-based analysis. Using the Web of Science database, 149,419 papers on cancer diagnosis and prognostic biomarkers were collected over three periods (2006-2011, 2012-2017, and 2018-2023). For each period, 500 core keywords were extracted using the weighted PageRank algorithm, and keyword co-occurrence networks were analyzed to identify temporal changes in the network structure indicators. Clustering was performed based on integrated keywords and evolutionary patterns were analyzed through research intensity and openness measurements. An attribute-based overlay analysis was conducted, along with analyses of keyword retention/turnover rates. Biomarker research has evolved from pathology-based diagnostic technology (2006-2011) and liquid biopsy-based noninvasive diagnostic technology (2012-2017) to AI- and immune-based precision medicine (2018-2023). Network structure analysis revealed an increased density and clustering of keyword connections over time, with expanded inter-cluster connections, indicating research topic convergence and increased structural complexity. Cluster 3 (Immune/AI-based Precision Medicine) exhibited the highest keyword turnover rate (0.545), emerging as a recent research focus, whereas Cluster 1 (Solid Tumor Pathology/Molecular Mechanisms) maintained stability with high keyword retention and a low change rate. This study introduces a temporal keyword co-occurrence network framework for detecting structural transitions in cancer biomarker research, providing an analytical perspective that complements conventional frequency-based bibliometric approaches. These findings offer quantitative insights into the technological complexity and convergent patterns of research development, reflected in increasing inter-cluster connectivity and integrated research trajectories in cancer diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorData MiningNeoplasmsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansBiomarkers, TumorCancer biomarkersKeyword co-occurrence networkResearch evolutionTechnological transitionTemporal network analysis

Identifiers

PMID42162114
PMCPMC13388673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.