Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162109›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A novel adaptive Gaussian FOPID controller design for automatic voltage regulator system.

Seymanur Baslik, Omur Akyazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seymanur Baslik *Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, 06010, Ankara, Türkiye.
Omur Akyazi *Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61830, Trabzon, Türkiye. oakyazi@ktu.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fundamental aim of a power system is to deliver electricity to consumers in a secure, continuous, and reliable manner. Achieving this goal requires maintaining the overall stability of the power system. Stability is a multifaceted concept that encompasses components such as voltage, frequency, and rotor angle; this study focuses on voltage stability. Within synchronous generators, automatic voltage regulator (AVR) systems are essential for sustaining voltage stability. To improve the dynamic performance and robustness of the AVR system, this study proposes a new control method called Gaussian-based fractional-order PID (GFOPID) controller. The controller parameters for the proposed GFOPID structure are optimized using the Jellyfish Search (JS) optimization algorithm. In the optimization phase, we employed several well-known error metrics as performance criteria: the integral of absolute error, the integral of squared error, the time-weighted integral of absolute error, the time-weighted integral of squared error, and the user-defined Zwe Lee Gain (ZLG) objective function. The performance of the JS-GFOPID controller in the AVR system was assessed through analyses of time-domain response, robustness, reference signal change, disturbance rejection, and nonlinear effects. The GFOPID controller was compared with fractional-order PID (FOPID) controllers, which have gained considerable acceptance in recent years when used with different metaheuristic algorithms. Under reference-changing inputs, the proposed GFOPID/ITAE controller provides between 25-73% improvement in IAE, 2-63% in ISE, and 21-57% in ITAE when compared with benchmark FOPID-based strategies.

Indexed as

A novel adaptive controllerAVR systemGaussian FOPIDJellyfish search algorithmVoltage stability

Identifiers

PMID42162109
PMCPMC13392483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.