ArticleScientific reports2026
Micro-fragmentation of four coral species towards the assembly of modular 3D structures for restoration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coral reefs are experiencing severe decline due to anthropogenic stressors and natural disturbances, necessitating innovative restoration strategies. Micro-fragmentation is a method used for accelerating coral growth and enhancing reef rehabilitation. This study investigates the use of micro-fragments to cover an artificial three-dimensional bottomless cube structure designed to increase space efficiency, structural complexity, and scalability for coral restoration. We examined four Hexacorallia species, Cyphastrea microphthalma, Galaxea fascicularis, Pocillopora favosa and Stylophora pistillata to evaluate species-specific and source colony-specific survival and growth rates. Over 204 days, micro-fragments demonstrated both tissue growth and fusion, at varying degrees, with G. fascicularis exhibiting the highest survival and growth rates. Corals grew and fused over the surfaces of the test structures and fused across corners. Our results demonstrate variation in fragment survival and fusion potential among species and colonies, highlighting the importance of source colony and species selection in restoration efforts. Notably, we found that coral fragments could successfully fuse after six months of separation. This approach has broad applications in reef restoration and the ornamental coral trade, offering a scalable solution to lessen the impact of coral harvesting on natural ecosystems. Our findings highlight the potential of designed 3D structures to support efficient coral restoration in degraded reef environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.