ArticleScientific reports2026
A neural network embedding the linear-quadratic model for improved prediction of cellular response to ion beam exposure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting biological responses to ionizing radiation is challenging due to the complex, multi-scale mechanisms involved. Traditional machine learning (ML) models that fit experimental data on cell survival can be sensitive to experimental uncertainties and lack theoretical consistency. This study developed and validated a neural network (NN) framework that integrates established radiobiological constraints directly into its architecture and training process. The objective was to predict cell surviving fractions (SF) and key radiosensitivity parameters for various cell types and radiation qualities in a manner that remains consistent with known dose-response behaviour. A multi-branch feedforward NN was developed to simultaneously predict SF and derived parameters including the linear-quadratic model (LQM) parameters α and β, the mean inactivation dose (MID), the dose at 10% survival (D₁₀), and the relative biological effectiveness at 10% survival (RBE₁₀). The model architecture explicitly embeds the LQM formula and the calculations of radiosensitivity parameters within dedicated custom layers. A custom loss function penalizes deviations from known ranges and balances multiple prediction objectives. Trained and validated using the Particle Irradiation Data Ensemble (PIDE) via ten-fold cross-validation, the NN achieved high prediction accuracy. Predicted SF values were in excellent agreement with experimental data (R² ≈ 0.95). The model also robustly predicted D₁₀ and MID values (R² ≈ 0.80) and RBE₁₀ value (R² ≈ 0.75). Predictions of LQM's α parameter were reasonably correlated (R² ≈ 0.65), whereas β parameter predictions exhibited greater uncertainty. The integration of the LQM formalism into the NN architecture yielded a model that produces consistent predictions parameterized by mechanistically relevant variables across diverse radiation qualities. Constraining the model with established radiobiological constraints improved its ability to link input features to cellular outcomes, ensuring accurate dose-response modeling and valid extrapolations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.