ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrative taxonomy of cryptic Pachypus chafers using museomics, morphometrics, barcoding, and genomic DNA analysis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Pachypodinae).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The taxonomy of the endemic Mediterranean genus Pachypus Dejean, 1821 has long been complicated by cryptic diversity and limited morphological differentiation. Based on extensive results from previous studies and new genomic data analyses, we perform here an integrative taxonomic revision of the genus. Using the morphological examination of the type material of most species and de novo sequencing of 978 metazoan-level universal single-copy orthologous genes (mzl-USCOs) of the almost 200-year-old lectotype of Pachypus impressus Erichson, 1840, we proposed refined species hypotheses within the genus. Resulting species entities from a recent study using mzl-USCOs were aligned within the framework of existing nomenclatorially available names inferred from Museomics and comparative morphological analyses. We additionally removed two existing taxon names from synonymy with Pachypus candidae and raised them to valid species: Pachypus cornutus (Olivier, 1789) and P. impressus Erichson, 1840. Pachypus excavatus Fabricius, 1792 is confirmed here as a valid species. This study also revealed one new synonymy: Pachypus impressus Erichson, 1840 (= P. melonii Sparacio, 2008, syn. n.). Furthermore, we described seven new species which had been already delineated in our earlier study: Pachypus baroniensis sp. n., P. franginii sp. n., P. gallurensis sp. n., P. matzaccara sp. n., P. occidentalis sp. n., P. pelegrinus sp. n., and P. sulcis sp. n. Extensive morphometric analyses of five datasets (one based on distance measurements and four on body outlines), including about 1,900 specimens, confirmed the cryptic character of most Pachypus species, as morphospace plots of all traits largely overlapped among most of the species. This made the assignment of analyzed type specimens to retrieved morphometric clusters a poor predictor of the true identity of mzl-USCO-defined species. We designated a lectotype of Pachypus impressus Erichson, 1840 and a neotype of Pachypus cornutus (Olivier, 1789). Finally, for the purpose of enhancing applied DNA-based studies and metabarcoding, we extracted the 5' COI DNA sequences from the raw DNA reads of our target enrichment nucleotide data as well as from the newly sequenced lectotype of P. impressus. The phylogenetic tree inferred from these data was compared with that obtained from the previously produced 3' COI data generated by Sanger sequencing. The habitus and male genitalia of all species are illustrated, an identification key is provided, and the distribution of the species is shown. As a result of our long-term studies of the genus, we also provide new insights into the ecology and distribution of the group, which may be relevant to conservation across the entire circum-Tyrrhenian region. Zoobank link: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:34F3F1E1-2A40-4450-95B3-0336E6E2CF52.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.