Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162052›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Evaluation of YOLOv7-v13 models for multi-class small insect pest detection using the five-pest dataset.

Ayesha Hakim, M Habib Ur-Rahman, Ali Hamza, Munir P Hoffmann, Vakhtang Shelia, Muhammad Owais, Nimra Khan, Muhammad Saim Ibtesam, Muhammad Rashid, Reimund P Roetter

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ayesha Hakim *School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan. ayesha.hakim@mnsuam.edu.pk.
M Habib Ur-Rahman *Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstraße 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany. habib.rahman@uni-goettingen.de.
Ali HamzaInstitute of Computing, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.
Munir P HoffmannTropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstraße 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Vakhtang SheliaDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Muhammad OwaisInstitute of Computing, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.
Nimra KhanInstitute of Computing, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.
Muhammad Saim IbtesamInstitute of Plant Protection, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.
Muhammad RashidInstitute of Computing, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.
Reimund P RoetterTropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstraße 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pest infestation affects global agriculture, causing massive crop yield losses, ecosystem degradation, and negative economic impacts. High accuracy and efficiency in detecting small insect pests are crucial to avoid pesticide overuse and biodiversity loss. The objective of this research was to evaluate state-of-the-art object detection models (YOLOv7-v13) for multi-pest identification, focusing on small insect (< 5% image area) in mango (fruit flies), maize (fall armyworm), and cotton crops (pink bollworm) for effective decision-making. We developed the Five-Pest dataset comprising 17,251 images captured by IoT-based smart traps and 194,050 pest instances of five economically significant species (three fruit fly species, fall armyworm, and pink bollworm). Images were annotated via Roboflow, then augmented and smoothed ([Formula: see text]). YOLO models were trained under identical hyperparameters (40 epochs, batch 8, IoU = 0.8, max_det = 550). Performance was assessed by mAP@50, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. YOLOv9 achieved the highest mAP@50 (0.929), an average that includes lower precision such as fruit flies, underscoring the model's robustness across varied pest types. YOLOv9 was followed by YOLOv8 (0.924), YOLOv12 (0.922), YOLOv10 (0.921), YOLOv11 (0.909), and YOLOv13 (0.909), while YOLOv7 achieved mAP@50 of 0.899 for the Five-Pest dataset. YOLOv12 demonstrated comparable performance to YOLOv8 and YOLOv10 with stable precision and recall, whereas YOLOv13 achieved competitive detection performance but required substantially higher training time, indicating the accuracy-computational cost trade-off in later YOLO generations. All models detected fall armyworm with very high accuracy (mAP 0.96-0.99), while fruit flies (especially B. zonata) remained comparatively more challenging. Pink bollworm recognition remained consistently strong across all variants (mAP 0.91-0.97). To improve per-class detection robustness, an ensemble model averaging YOLOv7-YOLOv13 predictions showing enhanced consistency but requiring more computation. Here we identified the strengths and limitations of YOLO variants for small-insect detection, guiding the selection of models to help reducing pesticide use and enhancing environmental protection in precision agriculture.

Indexed as

InsectaAnimalsCrops, AgriculturalDetection AlgorithmsZea maysCNNCottonDeep learningGELANHyperparameter optimizationMaizeMangoModel ensemblePGISingle stage detectorSmall-object detection

Identifiers

PMID42162052
PMCPMC13392103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.