ArticleScientific reports2026
Examining the daily experiences of parents caring for children with rare neurogenetic conditions using over 18,000 ecological momentary assessments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parent caregivers of children with rare neurogenetic conditions experience daily challenges in meeting the needs of their child and family, though studies examining the daily experiences of caregivers are extremely limited. Here, we present pre-intervention ecological momentary assessment data from 495 parent caregivers of children with rare neurogenetic conditions who were enrolled in a clinical trial focused on caregiver well-being. We aimed to both describe typical daily routines across the sample, and to examine how daily experiences, context, and well-being interrelated over time. Across the two-week period, caregivers spent substantial time attending to family needs, often with limited social support and without also engaging in leisure and social activities that could ease burden and support well-being. Autoregressive cross-lagged models indicated a number of dynamic relationships among daily activities, social support, and indicators of well-being. Findings highlight potential targets for intervention to bolster caregiver support and promote healthy family dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.