Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162035›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep learning-based neonatal outcome prediction: an LSTM autoencoder framework for pattern analysis and risk assessment.

Safiya Parvin A, Saleena B

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Safiya Parvin ASchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
Saleena BSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India. saleena.b@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenomenon of neonatal mortality is a significant issue in health care, which necessitates the use of advanced analytical tools for early risk prediction. This work utilized the Medical Information Mart (MIMIC) Pediatric Intensive Care (PIC) database to develop a framework for identifying key biomarkers associated with mortality risk. The combination of many clinical data sources comprising more than two thousand Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Neonatal patient admissions (both alive and dead) were extracted. Biomarkers with an abnormal value were taken into consideration for further analysis. The patterns were analyzed using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) autoencoders that converted the biomarker data of both deceased and live neonates into meaningful representations. Similar biomarker patterns were clustered to gain insights into the mortality risk factors. The suggested framework is found to be superior to the existing neonatal scoring systems with a sensitivity of 88.1%, specificity of 89.5%, and Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUCROC) of 0.92. These results indicate the possibility of employing the biomarker patterns as predictors of neonatal mortality and the basis of a decision-support model.

Indexed as

Deep LearningInfant MortalityAutoencoderBiomarkersFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLong Short Term MemoryPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRisk AssessmentROC CurveBiomarkersClusteringLSTM autoencodersMortality patternsNeonatal sepsisNeonatal sequential organ failure assessment (nSOFA)Pediatric RISk of mortality (PRISM)

Identifiers

PMID42162035
PMCPMC13392051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.