Articlenpj aging2026
Discordance between measured and perceived vision in older adults: the need for objective screening despite health consciousness.
Article in npj aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceived visual problems in older adults do not always align with measured vision, potentially delaying diagnosis and timely intervention. In this cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the Proactive Ophthalmic Examination Cohort (Guangzhou, 2023-2024), we evaluated the prevalence and correlates of discordance between objective vision impairment (OVI, presenting visual acuity <20/40) and subjective visual disturbance (SVD, self-reported visual symptoms) among 829 health-conscious adults aged ≥65 years without prior intraocular interventions. Discordance was defined as two conditions: OVI without SVD or non-OVI with SVD. Associated factors were examined at the eye level using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Within this cohort, the prevalences of OVI and SVD were 42.8% and 44.6%, respectively (53.1% and 47.9% at the participant level). Discordance was substantial: 47.2% of OVI eyes did not report SVD, whereas 38.5% of non-OVI eyes reported SVD. SVD demonstrated limited accuracy for identifying OVI (sensitivity, 0.53; specificity, 0.64). The proportion of OVI eyes attributable to uncorrected refractive error was higher in OVI without SVD than in OVI with SVD (83.0% vs. 66.8%, p < 0.001). Higher income and lower Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores were associated with OVI without SVD, while lower income and higher SAS scores were linked to non-OVI with SVD; unilateral OVI was also associated with OVI without SVD. These findings indicate that SVD incompletely reflects OVI and underscore the need for routine objective vision screening in older populations, irrespective of perceived symptoms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.