Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162034›Full record

Articlenpj aging2026

Discordance between measured and perceived vision in older adults: the need for objective screening despite health consciousness.

Xueer Tu, Xun Wang, Lanqin Zhao, Duoru Lin, Weiming Huang, Jun Fu, Qiuping Zhong, Dongni Wang, Meimei Dongye, Zhenzhen Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xueer Tu *Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Xun Wang *Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Lanqin ZhaoZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Duoru LinZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Weiming HuangZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Jun FuZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Qiuping ZhongZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Dongni WangZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Meimei DongyeZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenzhen LiuZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Haotian LinZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China. linht5@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

Basic Scientific Research Projects of Sun Yat-sen University 23ykcxqt002Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar 2023B1515020100National Natural Science Foundation of China 82441003Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2025A1515012870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceived visual problems in older adults do not always align with measured vision, potentially delaying diagnosis and timely intervention. In this cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the Proactive Ophthalmic Examination Cohort (Guangzhou, 2023-2024), we evaluated the prevalence and correlates of discordance between objective vision impairment (OVI, presenting visual acuity <20/40) and subjective visual disturbance (SVD, self-reported visual symptoms) among 829 health-conscious adults aged ≥65 years without prior intraocular interventions. Discordance was defined as two conditions: OVI without SVD or non-OVI with SVD. Associated factors were examined at the eye level using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Within this cohort, the prevalences of OVI and SVD were 42.8% and 44.6%, respectively (53.1% and 47.9% at the participant level). Discordance was substantial: 47.2% of OVI eyes did not report SVD, whereas 38.5% of non-OVI eyes reported SVD. SVD demonstrated limited accuracy for identifying OVI (sensitivity, 0.53; specificity, 0.64). The proportion of OVI eyes attributable to uncorrected refractive error was higher in OVI without SVD than in OVI with SVD (83.0% vs. 66.8%, p < 0.001). Higher income and lower Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores were associated with OVI without SVD, while lower income and higher SAS scores were linked to non-OVI with SVD; unilateral OVI was also associated with OVI without SVD. These findings indicate that SVD incompletely reflects OVI and underscore the need for routine objective vision screening in older populations, irrespective of perceived symptoms.

Identifiers

PMID42162034
PMCPMC13457553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.