Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162032›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A neustonic hydrozoan Porpita porpita drifts for over a year.

Daiki Wakita, Kaho Murai, Gaku Yamamoto, Ryota Tamada, Hisanori Kohtsuka, Kohei Oguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daiki Wakita *Misaki Marine Biological Station, The University of Tokyo, Miura, Kanagawa, 238-0225, Japan.
Kaho MuraiEnoshima Aquarium, Katasekaigan, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, 251-0035, Japan.
Gaku YamamotoEnoshima Aquarium, Katasekaigan, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, 251-0035, Japan.
Ryota TamadaKamo Aquarium, Imaizumi, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, 997-1206, Japan.
Hisanori KohtsukaMisaki Marine Biological Station, The University of Tokyo, Miura, Kanagawa, 238-0225, Japan.
Kohei Oguchi *Misaki Marine Biological Station, The University of Tokyo, Miura, Kanagawa, 238-0225, Japan. ogc@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neustonic organisms inhabiting the ocean surface have a unique ecology but remain poorly understood, particularly regarding longevity, due to difficulties in culturing and unpredictable occurrence. The blue button Porpita porpita is a colonial hydrozoan characterized by a chitinous, disc-shaped float that provides buoyancy and serves as the structural basis for zooid attachment, yet its growth and longevity have not been quantified. Here, we reared ten colonies for ≤ 21 days to measure float growth. Smaller colonies exhibited clear float enlargement, while larger colonies showed no detectable growth. Histology revealed peripheral accretion of new cuticular laminae at the float margin, suggesting margin-specific growth coupled to zooid budding. Based on the size-dependent decrease in growth rate, the observed radii were fitted with a Bayesian von Bertalanffy growth model. Estimated growth curves suggest that the sampled colonies persist for months to a few years, placing P. porpita on an intermediate timescale between short-lived scyphozoan medusae and long-lived benthic corals, and on a substantially longer lifespan than those previously reported for neustonic animals (< 1 year). These findings provide the first quantitative assessment of float growth in P. porpita, suggesting potentially long-term developmental strategy that enables colony persistence and contributes to a unique neustonic ecosystem.

Indexed as

HydrozoaAnimalsLongevityChitinCnidariaColonialityColony growthFloatLifespan

Identifiers

PMID42162032
PMCPMC13190681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.