ArticleScientific reports2026
Quality appraisal and hydrochemical analysis of groundwater for domestic and irrigation aspects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim of this study was to analyze the geochemical mechanisms that influence the composition of groundwater and determine the suitableness of groundwater quality for farming and domestic uses in the agricultural area of Mathura, India. This study also emphasized the significance of using a comprehensive approach which includes water pollution evaluating indexes and multivariate statistical techniques to investigate of hydrochemical analysis of groundwater quality and identification of contamination sources. Water samples were collected from different sampling sites and analyzed. 81.25% and 62.50% of the sampling sites of groundwater are above the maximum allowable levels for the concentration of fluoride and nitrate respectively as per BIS, 2012. Cluster analysis categorized sixteen sampling locations into three clusters based (High, moderately and less polluted) on observed data. Piper diagram concluded that the calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, are predominate ions showing its unsuitability for irrigation. According to the Wilcox diagram, US salinity laboratory diagram, Kelly index, Magnesium adsorption ratio, Permeability index, 6.25%, 31.25%, 25%, 93.75%, 18.75% respectively in the study area are classified as an unsuitable for irrigation. The present investigation provided useful information of suitable water management resource for healthy crop growth, human health, water resources management, and ultimately the sustainable development of the environment. Policymakers should focus on formulating regulations and strategies that promote sustainable groundwater use and conservation. This includes ensuring effective governance, raising public awareness, and implementing policies that balance environmental, social, and economic needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.