ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of toxic metal contamination and source allocation in agricultural soils of Chhattisgarh, India: multivariate and artificial network approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heavy metal (HM) accumulation is a significant environmental concern that endangers human health and the ecosystem due to increasing natural and anthropogenic activities. This study assessed the toxicity of fourteen different HMs in the soil samples taken from the agricultural sites situated along the national highways in Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India. Using a range of soil indices, such as contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), geo-accumulation index (Igeo), ecological risk assessment (ERA), and risk index (RI), the study examined the risk associated with the HMs such as boron, aluminum, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc, arsenic, molybdenum, cadmium, and lead. Their potential sources of origin were assessed using multivariate statistical techniques, coupled with positive matrix factorization (PMF) and self-organizing map (SOM). The CF and I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.