ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026
Dual ctDNA and CTCs analysis for minimal residual disease detection and relapse monitoring in early-stage breast cancer.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) by liquid biopsy could enable earlier relapse identification in early-stage breast cancer (BC), but most approaches are single-analyte. We prospectively studied 58 patients with early-stage BC, including HR+/HER2-, triple-negative, and HER2+ subtypes, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery plus adjuvant therapy. Patient-specific droplet digital PCR assays were designed for both ctDNA and CTCs analysis, with one truncal tumour mutation tracked per patient for detection in both analytes, in serial high-volume blood samples collected at diagnosis before treatment, approximately 1 month after surgery, and at 6-month intervals during follow-up in patients at high risk of relapse. We developed a composite Liquid biopsy Minimal Residual Disease (L-MRD) score integrating six clinical and molecular variables. At baseline (pre-treatment), ctDNA and/or CTCs were detected in 67.2% of patients and remained positive post-surgery in 53.6%. During follow-up, MRD detection anticipated all relapses (100% sensitivity; median lead time 27.95 months) and the L-MRD score stratified 5-year recurrence risk (2.2% vs 41.6%; HR = 6.6; P = 0.04) with strong performance (AUC = 0.891; NPV = 97.8%). This dual-analyte, longitudinal MRD strategy improves relapse prediction and supports further research regarding the clinical utility of personalised surveillance in early-stage BC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.