ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2026
A robotic patch-clamp system with real-time localization and phase-synchronized capture of dynamic in vivo cells using micropipette resistance modelling.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In vivo patch clamp is the gold standard for probing neuronal function in the intact brain of living animals through recordings of membrane potentials and picoampere-level ionic currents. To achieve this, the recording micropipette must first capture a target neuron and form a gigaohm-scale seal (gigaseal) at the cell membrane. This requires real-time localization of in vivo neurons whose positions fluctuate with physiological activity (e.g., respiration and vascular pulsation). Although two-photon microscopy enables cellular visualization, real-time motion tracking is constrained by the trade-off between imaging depth and temporal resolution, compromising capture success for moving cells. Here, we present a real-time localization method that enables vision-independent tracking of single-cell motion using micropipette resistance modeling. To denoise resistance signals, we develop a Multiple-Dominant-Frequency Weighted-Frequency Fourier Linear Combiner-Kalman Filter, enabling the tracking of neuronal motion with an average estimation error below 0.5 μm. We further introduce a phase-synchronized capture strategy that advances the micropipette to capture the in vivo cell at the farthest position in its motion cycle, thereby facilitating gigaseal formation. Based on the above work, we establish a robotic in vivo patch-clamp system that achieves an 81.8% gigaseal success rate in anesthetized mice, exceeding previously reported rates (~51% and ~24%) for robotic blind patch-clamp systems. We additionally obtain in vivo patch-clamp recordings in anesthetized rats and in both anesthetized and awake marmosets, representing the first demonstration of robotic in vivo patch-clamp recordings in awake marmosets and highlighting the robustness of our system across species and brain states.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.