ReviewRenal failure2026
Peritoneal dialysis in lupus nephritis: comparative outcomes vs. hemodialysis, risk stratification, and modality selection framework.
Review in Renal failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an effective and safe renal replacement therapy (RRT) for lupus nephritis (LN) patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This narrative review compares PD and hemodialysis (HD) in LN across both AKI and ESRD settings, highlighting differences in survival, cardiovascular outcomes, infection risk, and lupus flare incidence. We summarize clinical evidence demonstrating the preservation of residual renal function (RRF), hemodynamic stability, and improved cardiovascular tolerance associated with PD, while also noting challenges such as higher peritonitis susceptibility in chronically immunosuppressed patients. A structured risk stratification framework is presented to aid selection between PD and HD based on cardiac comorbidities, RRF, infection risk, catabolic state, pediatric status, and ability to perform home-based therapy. In addition, we outline a clinical decision algorithm to guide modality selection and discuss immunosuppressive strategies in PD-treated LN patients. Despite comparable mortality between PD and HD in most studies, PD may offer superior cardiovascular protection and lower flare risk in selected LN phenotypes. Early identification of ideal PD candidates, individualized prescription strategies, and multidisciplinary management are crucial to optimizing outcomes. This review provides a practical comparative synthesis, a decision-making framework, and future perspectives to support clinicians managing LN patients requiring dialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.