Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42161555›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Adaptive balancing of effort, accuracy and response speed in anomia treatment for post-stroke aphasia in community-based settings in the USA: a within-subjects randomised controlled trial protocol.

Candace M van der Stelt, Robert Cavanaugh, William D Hula, Jeffrey Starns, Alyssa Kelly, Mara L Goodman, Lauren Terhorst, Mohammad Hassany, Peter Brusilovsky, William S Evans

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05653440 (Integrating Complementary Learning Principles in Aphasia Rehabilitation Via Adaptive Modeling), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05653440 phase2recruitingnot on this map

Integrating Complementary Learning Principles in Aphasia Rehabilitation Via Adaptive Modeling (Sub-study 1: Balancing Effortful and Errorless Learning Via Adaptive Naming Deadlines)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2023 to 2028Enrolled30ConditionsAphasia, StrokeArmsAccuracy-maximized condition, Effort-maximized condition, Effort-accuracy balanced condition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Candace M van der SteltUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1265-352X
Robert CavanaughMGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown Navy Yard, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2114-6565
William D HulaUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-0753
Jeffrey StarnsUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Alyssa KellyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6851-6449
Mara L GoodmanUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0950-7496
Lauren TerhorstUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2326-8005
Mohammad HassanyUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8893-8454
Peter BrusilovskyUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1902-1464
William S EvansUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA will.evans@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-3473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnomia is a primary feature of aphasia that negatively impacts quality of life. Although current anomia treatments improve word retrieval, long-term retention and generalisation of trained words to discourse-level communication are rarely measured. Treatment that produces lasting naming gains and generalises to real-world use is one of the top priorities of people living with aphasia. Here, we report the protocol for a randomised clinical trial that investigates individualised anomia treatment through adaptive naming deadlines to achieve 'desirable difficulty' to promote learning retention and generalisation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We implement a within-subject sequential, crossover design in which 30 participants with chronic post-stroke aphasia will complete three anomia treatment conditions in randomised order: (1) an adaptive condition where the naming deadline (ie, amount of time the participant is given to name the item) dynamically adjusts between 1.5 and 10 s based on ongoing participant performance and (2) a static Effort-Maximised condition where there is a fixed 10-second naming deadline for all treatment sessions and (3) a static Accuracy-Maximised condition where items are presented immediately in auditory and orthographic form and are repeated by the participant. In each condition, participants are treated on 40 unique non-overlapping words across eight treatment sessions. Before and after each condition, participants complete naming probes and discourse probes. Treatment outcomes from the adaptive treatment will be tested against the two static conditions using linear mixed-effects modelling. Our primary outcome is performance on noun picture naming at 3 months post-treatment. We evaluate production of treated words in discourse probes as a secondary analysis. We predict that our novel, adaptive naming treatment will produce more successful outcomes compared with the static treatment conditions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh approved the trial protocol (Study 21120130). Following study completion, results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals. If hypothesised results are observed, the adaptive treatment will be a novel, empirically based intervention for long-term retention of anomia treatment gains, positively impacting the lives and recovery of individuals living with aphasia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05653440.

Indexed as

AnomiaAphasiaLanguage TherapyStrokeStroke RehabilitationAgedCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesREHABILITATION MEDICINESpeech pathologyStrokeSTROKE MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID42161555
PMCPMC13202119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.