ArticleBMJ open2026
Detection of age-related vision reduction in general practice in Denmark (DETECT): a study protocol for a feasibility and cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07015034 (Developing and Testing a Model to Identify Preventive Vision Loss Among Older Patients in General Practice), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Developing and Testing a Model to Identify Preventive Vision Loss Among Older Patients in General Practice (DETECT)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVision reduction is linked to reduced quality of life, self-care capacity, increased fall risk, cognitive decline and depression. Prevalence increases with age. In response, WHO recommends regular vision assessment at primary care level, such as general practice (GP), for adults +50 years. However, research on detection of age-related vision reduction in GP is limited. The objective is to assess the feasibility and clinical utility of implementing vision screening in Danish general practice following an annual control consultation for patients aged ≥70 years with minimum one chronic condition. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Complex health intervention in a Danish general practice setting. Testing a patient baseline questionnaire with 18 items on self-reported vision and quality of life in combination with three vision tests: Colenbrander Mixed Contrast Card Test for near vision, Amsler Grid test and Confrontational Visual Field Test. 18-20 GP clinics and 450 patients are planned to be included. After GP consultation, all patients visit a collaborating optometrist for a comprehensive vision assessment including refraction, intraocular pressure measurement, fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Data and pictures from the optometrist are evaluated by an ophthalmologist, who refers to further follow-up and/or treatment if deemed necessary.Feasibility outcomes: patient recruitment rate, patient adherence, as well as patients' and health providers' experiences with the intervention. CLINICAL OUTCOMES: GP staff assessment of patient vision and patient-reported assessment compared with ophthalmologic assessment. This includes identifying the need for new glasses and detecting eye diseases that require further evaluation, monitoring or treatment. This study will provide evidence on the feasibility of integrating vision screening into routine general practice, potentially helping expedient referrals and improving detection and access to primary eye-health care for older adults. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is registered and approved by Danish Research Ethics and Data Protection, VEK F-23070033 and in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07015034. Findings will be disseminated in peer-review journals, academic conferences and with the public through patient organisations and public health events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT07015034.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.