ArticleBMJ open2026
Mapping the evidence on digital interventions to improve postpartum contraceptive uptake among adolescent mothers: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdolescent mothers are at increased risk of rapid repeat pregnancy during the postpartum period, particularly in low-and middle-income countries where unmet need for contraception remains high. Stigma, limited autonomy and inadequate youth-friendly services contribute to low uptake of postpartum contraception. Digital health interventions have been proposed as scalable approaches to improve access to contraceptive information and support. However, evidence specifically focusing on digital interventions to enhance postpartum contraception among adolescent mothers has not yet been comprehensively mapped. This scoping review aims to identify and describe the available evidence in this area.
methodsThis review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley framework, with refinements by Levac ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and engagement with relevant stakeholders to inform research, policy and programme development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.