Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42161544›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Intranasal sufentanil versus ketamine for acute severe traumatic pain in children: protocol for a phase II randomised controlled trial (SUF-KET-PED).

Céline Mendes Dos Reis, Marco Olla, Emma Freyssinet, Emma Baranton, Aline Joulie, Eric Fontas, Antoine Tran

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06968546 (Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Sufentanil and Ketamine Intranasally in the Management of Severe Acute Trauma-related Pain in Children.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06968546 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this map

Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Sufentanil and Ketamine Intranasally in the Management of Severe Acute Trauma-related Pain in Children.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondation LenvalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled116ConditionsTraumatology, Wounds and Injury, Fractures Bone, AnalgesiaArmsIntranasal Sufentanil, Intranasal Ketamine (IN)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Céline Mendes Dos Reis *Paediatric Emergency, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL, Nice, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8550-502X
Marco Olla *Paediatric Emergency, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL, Nice, France.
Emma FreyssinetPaediatric Emergency, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL, Nice, France.
Emma BarantonPaediatric Emergency, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL, Nice, France.
Aline JoulieDélégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l'Innovation, CHU Nice, Nice, France.
Eric FontasDélégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l'Innovation, CHU Nice, Nice, France.
Antoine TranPaediatric Emergency, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL, Nice, France antoine.tran@hpu.lenval.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1836-2742

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEffective management of severe pain in children presenting to emergency departments remains challenging. Intravenous analgesia is often delayed due to technical and emotional difficulties related to vascular access. Intranasal administration offers a rapid, needle-free route. Although ketamine is widely used intranasally for paediatric analgesia, sufentanil may represent a potent alternative with favourable pharmacological properties. However, comparative paediatric data are lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SUF-KET-PED is a single-centre, randomised controlled superiority trial conducted in the paediatric emergency department of Lenval Children's Hospital, Nice, France. A total of 116 children aged 6 to 17 years presenting with severe traumatic limb pain (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) >6/10) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intranasal sufentanil at 0.5 µg/kg or ketamine at 1 mg/kg in addition to standard care including inhaled nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture. Pain will be assessed using the VAS at baseline and at predefined intervals up to 30 min. Sedation will be monitored using the Ramsay Sedation Scale and adverse events will be recorded throughout a 60-minute follow-up period.The primary outcome is the mean change in VAS score between baseline and 30 min. Secondary outcomes include time to effective analgesia, excessive sedation, adverse events, use of rescue analgesia and patient and parent satisfaction. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the French Ethics Committee CPP Sud Méditerranée V and authorised by the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, IDRCB no 2025-521075-31-00. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EU Clinical Trials Information System: 2025-521075-31-00. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT06968546.

Indexed as

Acute PainAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidKetamineSufentanilAdministration, IntranasalAdolescentChildClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicEmergency Service, HospitalEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleFranceHumansMalePain ManagementAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidKetamineSufentanilEmergency DepartmentsPAEDIATRICSPain managementRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID42161544
PMCPMC13202129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.