Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42161420›Full record

GuidelineClinical and experimental emergency medicine2026

2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 1. The update process and highlights.

Sung Phil Chung, Do Kyun Kim, Tae-Youn Kim, Youdong Sohn, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Yunhee Oh, Chun Song Youn, Mi Jin Lee, Jisook Lee and 7 more

Abstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sung Phil ChungDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Do Kyun KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Tae-Youn KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Youdong SohnDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Gyuhong ShimDepartment of Pediatrics, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Young Hwa JungDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yunhee OhDesign and Contents Team, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Chun Song YounDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Mi Jin LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.
Jisook LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Chang Hee LeeDepartment of Paramedicine, Namseoul University, Cheonan, Korea.
Youngbin JangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yong Soo JangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Gyu Chong ChoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Kyoung-Chul ChaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Ju Sun HeoDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Oh HwangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.

Funding

Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2024100BE7B-00Korean Association of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the expanding body of research on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and updates from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, the 2020 Korean CPR guidelines have been revised. This article presents the development process and summarizes the major updates in the 2025 Korean CPR guidelines. Seven task forces were established, with members nominated by professional societies involved in CPR. Each task force formulated key clinical questions and conducted systematic evidence reviews using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology. The 2025 CPR guidelines were finalized on the basis of the reviewed evidence and consensus discussions. The major updates are as follows: (1) addition of rehabilitation and recovery to the chain of survival; (2) inclusion of guidance for dispatchers on the use of automated external defibrillators; (3) recommendation that trained rescuers provide rescue breaths in cases of drowning-related cardiac arrest; (4) suggestion of double sequential defibrillation or vector-change defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation; (5) revision of the target temperature range for post-resuscitation temperature management from 32-36 to 33-37.5 °C; (6) recommendation of public access defibrillation for children aged ≥1 year; (7) suggestion to use supraglottic airway devices and video laryngoscopy in neonatal resuscitation; (8) recommendation for the use of feedback devices in CPR training; and (9) addition of a first aid section addressing cardiac arrest-related emergencies. These guidelines reflect the most current evidence, and their implementation and dissemination are expected to improve survival after cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary resuscitationGuidelinesHeart arrest

Identifiers

PMID42161420
PMCPMC13277410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.