Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42161401›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026

Immune tolerance versus cancer surveillance: an ongoing challenge.

Michael Agrez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael AgrezInterK Peptide Therapeutics Limited, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia michael.agrez@interk.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7650-6950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of anticancer immunity without compromising immune tolerance remains a challenge. Immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs) are the guardians of immune tolerance that underpin prevention of autoimmune responses. Tregs express checkpoint molecules that suppress autoreactive immune cells from being activated by endogenous (self) proteins. However, expression of these checkpoints on immune cells contributes to cancer cell evasion from the immune system while inhibition of checkpoint signaling in cancer immunotherapy induces autoimmune-related adverse events. Two instructive cytokines that regulate the opposing functions of immunosuppressive Tregs and anticancer responses mediated by cytotoxic natural killer cells include the interleukins, IL-2 and IL-12. An overview based on published data is described herein to highlight how manipulation of these cytokines may have dual action in oncologic and autoimmune models. This raises the possibility of exploiting mechanisms in cancer immunotherapy that could promote anticancer immunity while still maintaining immune tolerance. Given the role of peptides in protein-related interactions, it remains important in rational drug design to remain vigilant for potentially beneficial effects that could benefit both cancer surveillance and immune tolerance.

Indexed as

Immune ToleranceImmunologic SurveillanceImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryAutoimmuneCytokineImmune Checkpoint InhibitorImmune related adverse event - irAEImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42161401
PMCPMC13202026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.