Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42161252›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of haematology2026

Updates in Evidence-Based Decision Making for Upfront Surgical Interventions in Paediatric Lymphoma.

Liam Vierboom, Amos H P Loh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liam VierboomKK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Amos H P LohKK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8333-1486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical interventions have been integral to the management principles of paediatric lymphomas, but recent advancement of perioperative care standards and treatment protocols have led to new evidence that alters historical concepts regarding the optimal upfront management of these lesions. In patients presenting with mediastinal disease, general anaesthesia in the upfront setting was previously largely avoided due to significant perioperative cardiorespiratory risks. However, improved risk-determination frameworks and introduction of newer anaesthetic agents into current practice now permit safer conduct of upfront biopsies under deep sedation. This is important as accurate lesional sampling has become even more critical with the growing importance of accurate molecular subtyping. In patients with gastrointestinal lymphoma, upfront resection was advocated to surgically downstage disease and address the risk of impending bowel obstruction. Yet, unnecessarily extensive upfront surgery can delay commencement of systemic therapy, and many of such attempts do not achieve sufficiently clear resection margins. The improved efficacy of newer chemotherapy protocols may reduce the relative benefit of attempted surgical downstaging, but now introduce new issues with risks of delayed stricture formation. This review will evaluate emerging evidence, synthesising potential new practice recommendations for upfront surgical management of paediatric lymphomas, with a focus on mediastinal and gastrointestinal sites.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingLymphomaChildDecision MakingEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID42161252
PMCPMC13460651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.