ArticleSchizophrenia research2026
A mixed methods study of program-level factors influencing patient and family engagement in first episode psychosis coordinated specialty care.
Article in Schizophrenia research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Religiosity and Engagement in Early Intervention Programme for First-Episode Psychosis.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPoor patient retention and family engagement compromise the effectiveness of coordinated specialty care (CSC) for first-episode psychosis (FEP). This mixed methods study aimed to identify program-level characteristics (CSC fidelity and engagement strategies) associated with patient retention and family engagement in Massachusetts' CSC programs.
methodsPrimary outcomes were rates of patient retention and family engagement (≥1 evidence-based family intervention session), based on CSC program census (October 2022-September 2023). Quantitative analyses explored program characteristics (EPINET Program-Level Core Assessment Battery) and fidelity ratings (Massachusetts Psychosis Fidelity Scale) as predictors using t-tests or univariate linear regressions. Thematic analysis of program interviews compared patient and family engagement strategies employed by high versus low performing programs.
resultsAcross nine programs, mean patient retention was 86% (range: 58-97%) and family engagement was 40% (range: 12-100%). Higher fidelity to evidence-based services (e.g., individual therapy, family intervention, and supported education/employment) was significantly associated with both outcomes (p < .05; R
conclusionsHigher fidelity CSC programs had better patient retention and family engagement. Case management-related supports addressed treatment barriers. Strategies designed to strengthen therapeutic alliance and goal alignment may promote patient engagement, while family engagement may benefit from proactive recommendation of family intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.