Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42160748›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Development, Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Chatbot (Suzy) to Support Patients in Substance Use Disorder Recovery: Multiphase Study.

Warren Scott Comulada, Dallas Swendeman, Y Xian Ho, Joanna M Streck, Delta-Marie Lewis, Roxana Rezai, David Warren, Gladys Pachas, Maria Chandler, Jonathan L Jackson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Warren Scott ComuladaDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-6371
Dallas SwendemanDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4570-6352
Y Xian HoDimagi, Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1885-6136
Joanna M StreckCenter for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7842-9080
Delta-Marie LewisDimagi, Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-1796
Roxana RezaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5614-9483
David WarrenDimagi, Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-1536-0489
Gladys PachasCenter for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2983-2954
Maria ChandlerTCC Family Health aka The Children's Clinic, Long Beach, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-0409-2428
Jonathan L JacksonDimagi, Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7746-2129
Lillian GelbergDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9772-0116

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Sung-Jae Lee · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
UCLA-CDU CFARP30AI152501 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SCOTT G KITCHEN · 2022 to 2026
$15.6M
A conversational agent to support remote care for individuals with substance use disorderR44DA050218 · NIDA · DIMAGI, INC. · PI HO, Y. XIAN, JACKSON, JONATHAN LEE · 2023 to 2024
$1.8M
SUDCare: A smart mobile tool to support substance use screening and follow-up careR43DA050218 · NIDA · DIMAGI, INC. · PI HO, Y. XIAN, JACKSON, JONATHAN LEE · 2020 to 2020
$230k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI152501NIDA NIH HHS R43 DA050218NIDA NIH HHS R44 DA050218NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance use disorder (SUD) remains a major public health crisis in the United States, with significant challenges in treatment access, retention, and workforce capacity. SUD care teams, including addiction medicine physicians and peer recovery coaches (PRCs), support patients receiving SUD treatment but face heavy workloads and burnout. Artificial intelligence (AI) innovations, particularly large language model (LLM)-based chatbots, may extend PRC support and provide patients with on-demand recovery support between clinic visits and PRC contacts. However, evidence on their development, feasibility, acceptability, and usability in addiction services remains limited.

objectiveThis study describes the development, feasibility, acceptability, and usability of an AI-powered health coaching chatbot (Suzy) designed to support patients in SUD recovery.

methodsA total of 2 clinicians, 5 researchers, and 2 technology developers led a small, multiphase pilot study. In the formative phase, they conducted focus groups and qualitative in-depth interviews with 12 health care professionals and 8 patients with substance use histories to specify chatbot functions and develop a rule-based chatbot. In phase 2, they conducted usability testing of the rule-based chatbot with 8 patients who reported substance use and completed standardized tasks, surveys, and qualitative interviews. Measures included the System Usability Scale (SUS), Net Promoter Score (NPS), and Single Ease of Use Question (SEQ). In phase 3, they developed an LLM-based chatbot co-designed and fine-tuned with PRCs and other SUD experts.

resultsRule-based chatbot functions included craving management, appointment reminders, resource referrals, care team contacts, and goal setting. Usability task testing supported feasibility. In this small pilot sample, quantitative and qualitative feedback indicated acceptability and usability, with an average SUS score of 93 (benchmark 68), an NPS of 63 (benchmark 35), and a mean SEQ score of 6.5/7. Patients valued Suzy's approachable, nonjudgmental language and features that promoted accountability, self-monitoring, and 24/7 availability, while emphasizing that chatbots should supplement but not replace human support. The LLM-based chatbot development emphasized information accuracy, safety escalation protocols to mitigate risks of inappropriate chatbot responses, human-in-the-loop features, and expanded conversational flexibility and personal tailoring.

conclusionsIn this pilot study, a rule-based chatbot designed to support SUD care demonstrated feasibility, usability, and acceptability. LLM-based chatbot development required more robust safety and emergency reporting features, while offering more patient-responsive conversational functions. By providing on-demand coaching, referrals, and reminders, Suzy may extend the reach of care teams, alleviate provider burden, and enhance patient engagement. Additional work is needed to understand how to best integrate Suzy into patients' recovery journeys to ensure human support remains accessible and prioritized. LLM evaluation was based on expert testing and safety review. Clinical effectiveness, including the impact on substance use, was not evaluated. Next steps include evaluating the LLM chatbot in real-world settings with larger samples and assessing its efficacy in reducing substance use.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSubstance-Related DisordersAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLarge Language ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQualitative Researchartificial intelligencechatbotGPThealth coachhuman-centered designiterative developmentlarge language modelpeer recovery coachsubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID42160748
PMCPMC13234539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.