Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42160502›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2026

Artificial Intelligence Remote Patient Monitoring for Predicting Overall Survival for Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of the Prospective Trial.

Yansong Liu, Pramit Khetrapal, Ronnie Strafford, Adamos Hadjivasilou, Nikhil Vasdev, Philip Charlesworth, Muhamaad Shamim Khan, Ahmed Abdulaal, Zhaoyan Dong, James W F Catto and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yansong Liu *Centre for Artificial Intelligence, Department of Computer Science, University College London, 1st Floor, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, United Kingdom, 44 07939274833.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9618-5243
Pramit Khetrapal *Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8769-5797
Ronnie StraffordCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Department of Computer Science, University College London, 1st Floor, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, United Kingdom, 44 07939274833.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8614-9276
Adamos HadjivasilouCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Department of Computer Science, University College London, 1st Floor, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, United Kingdom, 44 07939274833.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2069-9499
Nikhil VasdevHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage and School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3966-5734
Philip CharlesworthRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-2812
Muhamaad Shamim KhanDepartment of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-0830
Ahmed AbdulaalCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Department of Computer Science, University College London, 1st Floor, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, United Kingdom, 44 07939274833.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3536-4803
Zhaoyan DongCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Department of Computer Science, University College London, 1st Floor, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, United Kingdom, 44 07939274833.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5433-0179
James W F CattoDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2787-8828
Yukun ZhouCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Department of Computer Science, University College London, 1st Floor, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, United Kingdom, 44 07939274833.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0840-6422
John D KellyDepartment of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7036-1923
Ivana DrobnjakCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Department of Computer Science, University College London, 1st Floor, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, United Kingdom, 44 07939274833.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-1715

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have highlighted the benefits of using artificial intelligence-powered remote patient monitoring (AI RPM) in detecting health changes across various disease cohorts. However, the use of AI RPM for identifying health deteriorations in patients following major surgical procedures remains underexplored. Objective: This exploratory analysis of a prospective trial aims to assess how AI RPM can enhance the predictive performance of 35-month post-radical cystectomy (RC) mortality risk. Our approach highlights the importance of RPM features in improving prediction accuracy and provides interpretable model outputs to enhance clinical understanding and transparency. Methods: We used patient data from a multicenter RC trial conducted in the United Kingdom for model training and validation. Two gradient-boosted machine learning models were developed: one using only clinical-pathological (CP) features and another incorporating both CP and remote patient monitoring (RPM) features (CP+RPM). RPM features are measured by wrist-worn pedometers and surveys. The predictive accuracy of the CP+RPM model was compared with both the CP model and a clinically used nomogram, both of which relied solely on traditional clinical features. We used 200 bootstrap iterations, with 70% of the data used for training and 30% for testing. Shapley Additive Explanations were applied to interpret model results and provide insights into the relative importance of features, improving transparency and understanding of the predictions. Results: A total of 252 patients (33 deaths) from 9 UK centers were included in the analysis. We examined 108 RPM features and 24 CP features for model training. In correlation analysis, only 9 CP features showed coefficients larger than 0.1, compared with 36 RPM features with stronger correlations. The CP+RPM model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77, reflecting a 9% and 10% absolute (13% and 15% relative) improvement over the CP and nomogram models, respectively. Similarly, it outperformed in terms of the area under the precision-recall curve, with a score of 0.44, marking a 6% and 17% absolute (16% and 63% relative) increase compared with the CP and nomogram model. Shapley Additive Explanations analysis revealed that the most significant contributors to mortality prediction were mobility-related RPM features, such as the 30-second chair-to-stand test results and daily step count variance, which reflected the general activity levels of individuals. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that RPM features significantly enhance long-term survival prediction for post-RC patients, offering a valuable addition to traditional clinical data. The integration of AI with RPM enables more individualized and dynamic tracking of recovery, improving prediction accuracy and fostering a patient-centered care model that has the potential to be applied across a broader range of surgeries and conditions.

Indexed as

AI RPMartificial intelligencemachine learningmobile phoneradical cystectomyremote patient monitoringsurvival predictionwearable device

Identifiers

PMID42160502
PMCPMC13189257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.