Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42160437›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Computational neural dynamics of goal-directed visual attention in macaques.

Jie Zhang, Nuttida Rungratsameetaweemana, Shuo Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1464-8639
Nuttida RungratsameetaweemanaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Shuo WangDepartment of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2562-0225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Goal-directed visual attention requires the dynamic integration of task goals with perceptual and mnemonic processes across distributed cortical networks. Using large-scale recordings from V4, IT, OFC, and LPFC, we observed that population dynamics robustly represented visual categories during cue presentation, sustained cue information across delay periods, and differentiated both categories and attentional states during search. Cue-related activity predicted subsequent search efficiency, linking presearch processing to behavioral performance. The orthogonal subspace provided a crucial latent representational structure for encoding and maintaining task-relevant information across search stages. Foveal attention enhanced peripheral representations by both increasing pattern separation and reshaping representational geometry in a nonlinear, context-dependent manner. Search dynamics further reflected fixation history and target detection, which modulated both response strength and representational structure. Lastly, V4 and IT encoded the spatial geometry of the search array, preserving its layout. Together, these findings highlight population-level dynamics as critical mechanisms supporting goal-directed visual attention.

Indexed as

AttentionGoalsVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAnimalsCuesMacaca mulattaMalePhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42160437
PMCPMC13189128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.