Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42160396›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Defining Global Health Diplomacy: Assessing United States Global Health Diplomacy actors' knowledge, skills, and competencies.

Floramae Esapebong-Ray, Karen McDonnell, Rebecca Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Floramae Esapebong-RayFormer Council on Foreign Relations International Affairs Fellow, Department of State, Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9476-2245
Karen McDonnellDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Rebecca KatzCenter for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally reshaped the field of Global Health Diplomacy (GHD), necessitating a coordinated international response that strived for equitable access to limited health resources. The pandemic, however, also exposed gaps in GHD actors' preparedness and response capabilities, which impacted their ability to navigate critical global health challenges. Addressing gaps in the knowledge, skills, and competencies of GHD actors is crucial to ensuring a more effective response to emerging infectious diseases and health challenges, particularly amid reduced foreign assistance. This study, conducted between December 1, 2023, and January 10, 2024, explores the knowledge, skills, and competencies required by U.S. GHD actors using an integrated Grounded Theory and descriptive research design. It identifies thematic similarities and differences across Core, Multistakeholder, and Informal GHD actors, offering actionable recommendations for tailored GHD training and competency-building. The findings provide critical insights into the professionalization of GHD and its role in advancing global health security and diplomacy in a post-pandemic era. With ongoing resource constraints, geopolitical shifts, declining multilateralism, and changes to the field of global health, strengthening GHD is even more vital for addressing emerging health threats and building future resilience.

Identifiers

PMID42160396
PMCPMC13189407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.