ArticlePLoS pathogens2026
Chemotaxis to plant defense compounds in phytopathogens.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant pathogens possess about twice as many chemoreceptors as the bacterial average, suggesting broad chemotactic capacities. The signals recognized by most phytopathogen chemoreceptors are unknown, and the reasons for this elevated chemoreceptor number is unclear. We identified the signals recognized by three chemoreceptors, PacH, PacI and PacG, in the global phytopathogen Pectobacterium atrosepticum. The ligand-binding domains (LBDs) of these chemoreceptors share modest sequence similarity, but the signals they recognize are structurally similar, and their biosynthetic pathways are interwoven. Whereas PacH and PacI recognized benzoate derivatives, including salicylate, vanillin and p-hydroxybenzoate, PacG bound agmatine, feruloylagmatine and p-coumaroylagmatine. These compounds are known plant defense compounds, their production is induced by pathogen attack, and they typically accumulate at infection sites. All compounds, except agmatine, induced chemoattraction, which was abolished by mutations in the corresponding genes. Agmatine competed with feruloylagmatine and p-coumaroylagmatine for PacG-LBD binding in vitro and antagonized chemotaxis in vivo. A mutant in pacG, but not in other chemoreceptor genes, showed reduced virulence in planta. We report high-resolution structures of PacG-LBD that were used for ligand-docking experiments to identify its binding pocket. PacH, PacI and PacG homologs were identified in other important phytopathogens belonging to the Burkholderia, Erwinia, Ralstonia, Pectobacterium and Dickeya genera. This is the first report of chemotaxis to feruloylagmatine, p-coumaroylagmatine and p-methoxybenzoate, expanding the range of chemoeffectors. Bacteria thus exploit plant defense responses by moving to compounds that are secreted at infection sites in response to pathogen attack. Chemotaxis to plant defense compounds may be a means to access infected plants and infection sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.