ArticlePloS one2026
Spinal mechanisms and feasibility of Dry Needling versus Botulinum Toxin Type A in post-stroke lower limb spasticity: A proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial protocol (STROKE-POC).
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06296082 (Comparative Study of the Mechanism of Action of Dry Needling and Botulinum Toxin Type A as a Treatment for Lower Limb Post-stroke Spasticity), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Study of the Mechanism of Action of Dry Needling and Botulinum Toxin Type A as a Treatment for Lower Limb Post-stroke Spasticity: a Proof of Concept Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStroke often causes spasticity, impacting mobility and quality of life. Botulinum Toxin type A (BTX-A) and Dry Needling (DN) are treatments that reduce spasticity, although Botulinum Toxin type A injections can cause adverse effects. No studies have directly compared their effects at spinal, muscular, functional, quality-of-life, and cost-effectiveness levels. This study aims to determine the spinal mechanisms of BTX-A and DN on post-stroke lower limb spasticity, while also assessing feasibility, safety, and exploratory effects at muscular, functional, quality-of-life, and cost-effectiveness levels. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol of a proof-of-concept, feasibility randomized clinical trial including 90 participants from Canada, Belgium, and Spain who experienced a first stroke in the previous 12 months and present plantar flexor spasticity. Time since stroke (0-12 months) will be recorded and explored as a potential modifier of treatment response. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either one session of BTX-A or 12 weekly sessions of DN. Blinded evaluators will assess outcomes before, during, and after treatment, with a 4-week follow-up. The primary outcome will be spinal mechanisms of spasticity, measured using the Tonic Stretch Reflex Threshold and its velocity sensitivity. Secondary outcomes will assess: a) muscular architecture and echotexture (measured with ultrasound); b) muscle tone/resistance using the Modified Ashworth Scale; c) gait and mobility (instrumented analysis, Timed Up and Go, 10-Meter Walk Test); d) muscle strength with dynamometry; e) quality of life with the EuroQoL questionnaire; and f) cost-effectiveness (analytic model). The findings will provide preliminary data to inform a future definitive trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research project has secured funding from the NEURON ERA-NET 2022 call, supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 program (GA 964215) and co-funded by the European Union-Next Generation, and has undergone peer review. Ethical approval has been obtained from Spain, Canada, and Belgium. The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06296082) and the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) under the number 2024-510866-18-00. The study protocol is registered on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20034064). CLINICAL TRIALS: Clinical Trials NCT06296082; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06296082.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.