Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42160331›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

PowerNovo2: A generative flow-based approach to non-autoregressive de novo peptide sequencing.

Denis V Petrovskiy, Kirill S Nikolsky, Vladimir R Rudnev, Liudmila I Kulikova, Tatiana V Butkova, Kristina A Malsagova, Arthur T Kopylov, Anna L Kaysheva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Denis V PetrovskiyInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Kirill S NikolskyInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3571-513X
Vladimir R RudnevInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Liudmila I KulikovaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7293-1504
Tatiana V ButkovaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5111-3863
Kristina A MalsagovaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Arthur T KopylovInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Anna L KayshevaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4472-2016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomics utilizes tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to determine peptide sequences, traditionally through database searches constrained by prior knowledge. De novo sequencing offers a database-free alternative but struggles with accurately modeling complex MS/MS spectra. Most current tools use autoregressive decoding, which is prone to error propagation and computationally slow. Here we present PowerNovo2, a non-autoregressive model based on generative normalizing flows. By leveraging variational inference, it effectively captures intricate token dependencies and peptide-level uncertainties. PowerNovo2 outperforms existing de novo tools in accuracy and speed, matching state-of-the-art autoregressive models like Casanovo while being 4.3 times faster. It also demonstrates competitive performance against other non-autoregressive methods such as π-PrimeNovo, particularly on long peptides and low-resolution spectra. As the first flow-based de novo sequencer, PowerNovo2 provides a scalable, accurate solution for large-scale proteomic applications.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteomicsSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptides

Identifiers

PMID42160331
PMCPMC13215612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.