ArticlePloS one2026
A brief xerostomia inventory for young adults.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveXerostomia (dry mouth) is a common condition that negatively impacts life quality for adults of all ages. Yet, xerostomia has primarily been studied among older adults and populations at high risk of dry mouth, with no widely-available self-reported instrument to assess xerostomia accurately among younger populations. This study aimed to develop a brief xerostomia assessment tool specifically designed for young adults.
methodsStudents ages 18-24 at two California (USA) public universities (N = 278) completed a cross-sectional survey that included a 14-item xerostomia inventory, including new items and items previously tested among older adults. Using exploratory factor analysis and item response theory analysis, the inventory was reduced to a 5-item scale. Psychometric properties of the 5 items were examined. As further validity checks, associations were explored between scale sum scores and other oral health conditions and potential xerostomia risk indicators.
resultsA proposed 5-item Young Adult version of the Shortened Xerostomia Inventory (SXI-Y) had favorable psychometric properties in this population, including excellent internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.817) and strong correlation with a global measure of dry mouth (polychoric correlation = 0.711). SXI-Y sum scores (overall mean = 7.3; median = 6; range: 5-18) were higher (indicating more severe xerostomia) among participants who reported gum bleeding, oral pain, and halitosis and those taking prescription medications, using nicotine or cannabis, and reporting less sleep and more stress.
conclusionsIn this study, a xerostomia measure tailored for young adults demonstrated stronger internal consistency and retained more item-level information than an earlier tool developed for older adults. Associations of xerostomia with sleep and stress merit further investigation, as does instrument testing in additional study populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.