ArticlePloS one2026
Socioeconomic status and the relationship of physical performance with activities of daily living among US older adults.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndependence in activities of daily living (ADLs) is an important health outcome for older adults and a predictor of morbidity and mortality. Physical performance is closely associated with ADL independence. It is not clear if socioeconomic status (SES) may alter this relationship so that people with more resources may remain independent at lower performance.
objectiveTo assess whether SES is an effect modifier of the association between physical performance and ADL limitations.
methodsUsing data from the Health and Retirement Study, we considered two outcomes in logistic regression models: cross-sectional presence of ADL limitations and longitudinal development of new limitations. We separately considered two performance measures, gait speed (gait) and grip strength (grip), and three SES measures, education, income, and wealth, with and without an interaction term, for a total of 12 regressions. Covariates were age, sex, comorbidity count, cognition, and BMI (for grip) or height (for gait).
resultsRespective sample sizes for gait and grip were 4,825 and 3,401 in cross-sectional analysis and 3,995 and 2,860 longitudinally. They were 57-59% female with median ages 69.0-75.4 years. In regressions without interaction terms, gait and grip were significantly associated with greater odds for the presence or development of ADL limitations (0.95 and 0.97 respectively for grip, 0.03 and 0.20 for gait) while SES measures were not. When interaction terms were included, none reached statistical significance.
conclusionsWe found that SES did not modify the relationship between performance measures and ADL limitations cross-sectionally or longitudinally. Greater SES may not reduce the effort needed for ADLs, or Americans with low SES may similarly access adaptive equipment. Maintaining physical performance remains key for maintaining independence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.