Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42160316›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Toward transparent intelligence: Explainable stacked ensembles learning for LiDAR point cloud segmentation.

Afridi Rahman Bondhon, Emon Kumar Dey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Afridi Rahman BondhonInstitute of Information Technology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5194-8033
Emon Kumar DeyInstitute of Information Technology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation of LiDAR point cloud data has various applications, ranging from urban planning to environmental monitoring. Although machine learning approaches have achieved impressive segmentation performance, their black-box nature often limits their interpretability. While stacked ensemble learning improves segmentation accuracy by combining multiple classifiers, it further increases model complexity and obscures decision transparency. To address this gap, this study proposes an explainable stacked ensemble framework for LiDAR point cloud segmentation that integrates multiple base learners with Logistic Regression as a meta-model and incorporates model-agnostic Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets demonstrate segmentation accuracies of 91.13% and 95.71%. The study also identifies the most effective base models within the ensemble to facilitate optimal model selection. Furthermore, XAI-driven feature analysis enables effective feature reduction, achieving a minimum 7% reduction in training time while maintaining consistent accuracy. In addition, variants of the SHAP algorithm are employed to investigate the relevance of features and the impact of neighborhood selection strategies on the segmentation performance of each base model. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves competitive segmentation performance while improving interpretability and computational efficiency.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCloud ComputingMachine LearningAlgorithmsEnsemble LearningLogistic Models

Identifiers

PMID42160316
PMCPMC13189313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.