ArticlePloS one2026
Toward transparent intelligence: Explainable stacked ensembles learning for LiDAR point cloud segmentation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Segmentation of LiDAR point cloud data has various applications, ranging from urban planning to environmental monitoring. Although machine learning approaches have achieved impressive segmentation performance, their black-box nature often limits their interpretability. While stacked ensemble learning improves segmentation accuracy by combining multiple classifiers, it further increases model complexity and obscures decision transparency. To address this gap, this study proposes an explainable stacked ensemble framework for LiDAR point cloud segmentation that integrates multiple base learners with Logistic Regression as a meta-model and incorporates model-agnostic Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets demonstrate segmentation accuracies of 91.13% and 95.71%. The study also identifies the most effective base models within the ensemble to facilitate optimal model selection. Furthermore, XAI-driven feature analysis enables effective feature reduction, achieving a minimum 7% reduction in training time while maintaining consistent accuracy. In addition, variants of the SHAP algorithm are employed to investigate the relevance of features and the impact of neighborhood selection strategies on the segmentation performance of each base model. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves competitive segmentation performance while improving interpretability and computational efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.