ArticlePloS one2026
Advancing inclusion in sports for students with disability: A mixed-methods study on awareness and perspectives toward adaptive sports.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adaptive sports promote inclusion, participation, and well-being in individuals with disabilities. However, limited research has examined the knowledge, awareness, and perceptions of adaptive sports, as well as institutional support and barriers within Saudi universities. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. A cross-sectional survey (n = 350; 18.29% reported disabilities; 70.57% females; mean age 28 ± 11 years) assessed knowledge, awareness, perceptions, and perceived barriers to adaptive sports among students, faculty, and administrative staff. Survey findings informed purposive sampling for the qualitative phase, which included focus group discussions with faculty and semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (SWDs) to contextualize quantitative patterns. The qualitative phase included a focus group discussion, and six interviews were conducted virtually using Microsoft Teams. Participants demonstrated uneven knowledge of adaptive sports (mean score: 8/16). While most correctly recognized their role in enhancing physical education and promoting participation through adapted equipment (>83%), but low understanding of classification (19.71%) and healthcare roles (30.57%). Awareness was low across all domains, particularly in training (75.71% unaware) and participation (80.57% unaware), indicating significant gaps in exposure and education. Although most participants recognized the benefits of adaptive sports, they noted the lack of sufficient policies, accessible facilities, promotion, and staff support. Less than 30% reported inclusive programs, and 16.29% perceived equal funding for parasports training. The key barriers included a lack of awareness (43.14%), inaccessible facilities (41.42%), and limited resources (40%). Interviews with students with disabilities and focus groups with faculty and specialists revealed positive experiences, emphasizing personal growth and social inclusion, but also identified challenges in infrastructure, recruitment, and policy. Despite favorable perceptions, substantial gaps persist in knowledge, accessibility, and institutional commitment. Addressing these issues through awareness campaigns, improved facilities, and inclusive policy development is vital for advancing adaptive sports participation and fostering a culture of inclusion in Saudi higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.