ArticlePloS one2026
Cache-efficient and vectorized parallel dynamic programming for RNA folding.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, we present an efficient and concise OpenMP implementation of the Nussinov RNA folding algorithm, a well-known representative of non-serial polyadic dynamic programming (NPDP). Our goal is to develop an optimized implementation that can serve as a template for related dynamic programming applications. The proposed code is derived from a detailed analysis of manual implementations, emphasizing the separation of problematic and non-problematic instances and structuring computations in a way analogous to matrix multiplication. This design enables the semi-automatic extraction of data locality using tools based on Presburger arithmetic-techniques widely employed in classical loop transformations and advanced source-to-source compilers grounded in the polyhedral model. In the experimental evaluation, we assess the performance of our implementation on modern massively parallel AMD and Intel processors with 64, 128, and 192 threads. Our approach leverages cache-aware tiling, parallelism, and explicit vectorization to maximize computational efficiency, achieving performance that surpasses both automatically generated compiler-based solutions and manually tuned implementations on the evaluated platforms. Specifically, our implementation achieves execution times up to two orders of magnitude faster than polyhedral code, while also outperforming unvectorized manual approaches-being at least 30 × faster than array transposition-based methods and at least 5 × faster than the tiled sparsified Four Russians variant. Additionally, our results indicate that CPU implementations do not exhibit significantly worse performance compared to their corresponding GPU counterparts. These results demonstrate the importance of leveraging Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) to fully exploit the capabilities of modern multi-core processors, particularly those in the AMD Epyc family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.