ArticlePloS one2026
How climate change shapes global systemic risk transmission: A complex network approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the dynamic impact of climate change performance on extreme tail risk transmission across global financial markets. Based on the "Too Extreme to Fail" conceptual framework, we propose a cascading failure network model using QRNN-∆CoVaR and QRNN-∆CoES to quantify the domino effect of tail risk propagation. The model captures tail dependencies and reveals how variations in climate governance performance modulate the intensity and pathways of risk contagion. Our main analysis utilizes daily market data from 1998 to 2024, aligned with the Climate Change Performance Index data from 2007 through a matched time window approach. The findings demonstrate that climate-sensitive factors significantly amplify systemic vulnerabilities, whereas superior climate governance serves as a critical risk buffer during periods of extreme volatility. Empirical results reveal significant spatial and temporal heterogeneity in risk contribution, with certain regions exhibiting higher sensitivity and momentum during major financial crises. Backtesting results confirm that our proposed nonlinear framework provides superior accuracy in quantifying global systemic risks compared to traditional linear methods, offering a robust tool for climate-integrated financial stability monitoring.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.