ArticlePloS one2026
Neither "lumpers" nor "splitters": A global revision of Flabellinidae s.l. nudibranchs (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Nudibranchia).
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nudibranch taxonomy is a prime example of the conflict between "lumpers" and "splitters": with rampant cryptic diversity, difficult to interpret morphological characters, plastic ecology, and variable levels of COI divergence among groups. As a result, it is extremely challenging to reach a consensus on what constitutes a species (not to mention a genus or a family). In this paper, we tackle a particularly problematic group, the family Flabellinidae s.l. Recent studies have shown that this group is polyphyletic and have suggested reclassifying the 84 described species into 29 genera across 7 families. However, further studies indicated the instability of the phylogenetic relationships between some of these species, genera, and families and suggested the need for further revisions of this group. The primary goal of the present study is a critical revision of the Flabellinidae s.l. diversity, by testing the monophyly of currently accepted genera and re-evaluating morphological synapomorphies for high-rank taxa, with the incorporation of previously overlooked taxa and some from poorly studied regions. We conducted an updated phylogenetic analysis based on four molecular markers. We also performed morphological analyses based on light and scanning electron microscopy. The analyses confirm the monophyly of Coryphellidae, Apataidae, and Paracoryphellidae. At the same time, the monophyly of Flabellinidae s.str., Samlidae, Unidentiidae, and Flabellinopsidae and the genera Edmundsella and Samla was questioned. Our results show that Samla rubropurpurata represents a new genus described herein as Launsina gen. nov. We also identify a new phylogenetic clade represented by specimens from the Kurile Islands, which corresponds to the recently established genus Mgueolia. This group is represented by at least four distinct species, three of which are described herein. We demonstrate that the facelinid genus Bajaeolis and the recently described genus Kynaria are members of the family Flabellinopsidae. Finally, we suggest that the family Piseinotecidae likely represents a senior synonym of the family Unidentiidae. Based on our comprehensive integrative analysis, we propose a new taxonomical scheme for Flabellinidae s.l. and identify consistent common traits and synapomorphies for each high-rank group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.