ArticlePloS one2026
Skeletons in the permafrost: Exploring climate-driven heritage loss and occupational health at the early modern whaling burial site of Likneset, Svalbard.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid Arctic warming is accelerating the degradation of permafrost-preserved archaeological sites, threatening both cultural heritage and the scientific information it contains. Early modern whaling burial sites on Svalbard are particularly vulnerable due to their organic-rich burial contexts and exposed coastal settings. This study presents an integrated taphonomic and osteological analysis of the Likneset whaling burial site in northwestern Svalbard, addressing climate-driven changes in preservation conditions (RQ1) and the embodied health costs of labour in early modern Arctic whaling (RQ2). The material comprises 20 individuals excavated across three phases (Phase I: 1985-1990, n = 14; Phase II: 2016, n = 3; Phase III: 2019, n = 3). The dataset allows comparison across excavation phases and between contrasting geomorphological settings within the burial site, distinguishing erosion-exposed areas (A) from a more stable central zone (B). Burial structures, coffins, skeletal remains, and textiles were assessed using a unified preservation scoring system, combined with osteological analyses of demography, metabolic disease, developmental stress, musculoskeletal degeneration, and trauma. Results show that preservation at Likneset is structured by local geomorphology and ongoing environmental change. Burials in erosion-exposed areas display extensive disturbance and loss of organic materials, while graves in more stable settings retain better-preserved structures, skeletons, and textiles. Comparison of closely spaced burials within the same erosion-exposed area, excavated several decades apart, documents continued in situ degradation, with textile materials declining more rapidly than skeletal remains. Osteological evidence indicates a largely homogeneous burial population composed predominantly of young adult men. Despite generally robust stature, the skeletal record documents widespread physiological stress, including metabolic disease, developmental stress markers, and extensive activity-related skeletal changes developing early in adulthood. Trauma is predominantly healed, suggesting that mortality was more closely linked to cumulative nutritional deficiency and prolonged physical strain. The results highlight growing challenges for heritage management on Svalbard, where strategies based on in situ preservation and managed decay are increasingly strained under warming permafrost conditions, underscoring the need for systematic monitoring, targeted documentation, and integration of archaeological data into climate adaptation planning before irreplaceable archives are lost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.